|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Math work accuracy
and evidence of understanding (question 1)
|
Answers are not correct.
Errors in logic are not evident due to lack of written
steps, diagrams, calculations or logical errors.
|
Answers are not correct.
Logical or computation errors are evident due to written
steps, diagrams, calculations and/or the like.
|
Answers are correct.
Evidence is clear, logical and easy to follow: written
steps, diagrams, and/or calculations are evident.
|
Answers are correct.
Evidence is clear, logical and easy to follow.: Written
steps, diagrams, and /or algorithms are evident. Written
conjecture analyzing the problem, its solution(s) are
accurate and evident. The student synthesizes their
knowledge of multiple math skills to formulate a rule
that will apply to other similar real-world problems,
including an example of a real-world problem and the
application of their rule to generate an accurate solution.
|
____
|
|
Timeliness
|
The student has not
completed or is missing significant pieces of the assignment,
and/or has not turned in all pieces of the project within
2 days of the due date.
|
The student has completed
most or all of the assignment: written, technology,
models, presentation with only minor pieces missing.
The student has all pieces of the assignment ready to
hand in within 1 day of the due date.
|
The student has completed
the assignment and all parts: written, technology, models,
questions, presentation and has all pieces of the project
to hand in on the due date.
|
The student has completed
the written, technology, models, presentation, questions,
and has all pieces of the project ready before the due
date: volunteers to go first.
|
____
|
|
Sketch (question
2)
|
The sketch is not complete,
and/or is not accurate.
|
The sketch is not complete.;
However, accuracy is evident in the completed portions.
|
The student produced
an accurate sketch that is clearly labeled.
|
The student produced
at least 2 accurate sketches that will solve the problem
presented in the question.
|
____
|
|
Presentation
|
The presentation was
poor, lacking in significant mistakes including: poor
scale choice, a lack of technology, lack of a convincing
argument and reading answers from notes.
|
The presentation was
not thorough which could include minor mistakes such
as: poor scale choice, a lack of technology, lack of
a convincing argument, missed questions, and reading
answers from notes.
|
The presentation was
thorough: including appropriate scale models, use of
technology and a convincing argument. All questions
were answered and answers were NOT READ from a paper.
Students may use notes to assist them or write important
findings on their presentation.
|
The presentation was
not only thorough, but it was completely convincing
to the audience. Clear evidence of topic knowledge,
speaking quality, practice, use of math vocabulary,
and additional insight to the answering of questions
is present.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|