|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
Main Idea
|
The prompt is restated
at the beginning of the response.
|
The idea of the prompt
is conveyed in an initial sentence, but it is not the
exact prompt.
|
The prompt is not restated
accurately, or it is not found directly at the beginning
of the entry.
|
The prompt is not restated.
|
____
|
Supporting Details
|
There are 2-3 reasonable
pieces of evidence which support the prompt or oppose
it based on the student��s view.
|
There is only 1 piece
of reasonable evidence used to support the student��s
view.
|
The evidence presented
is not reasonable or is not related to the main idea.
|
There are no supporting
details.
|
____
|
Word Choice
|
Proper math vocabulary
use is found consistently throughout the entry.
|
Proper math vocabulary
use is found consistently in the majority of their writing.
|
Students use math vocabulary
but it is incorrectly applied.
|
There is no evidence
of math vocabulary found.
|
____
|
Reflection
|
There is an accurate
reflection on the successes and challenges in the application
problems. There is evidence of planning for future instances.
|
There is an accurate
reflection on the successes and challenges in the application
problems.
|
There appears to be
some reflection on the process used in the application
problem but it may be inaccurate.
|
There is no reflection
on the application problem process.
|
____
|
Formatting/Presentation
|
The title of the Job
of the Day is at the top of the entry, underlined, followed
by the date, and handwriting is neat and precise with
illustrations.
|
The title of the Job
of the Day is at the top of the entry and is underlined,
handwriting is neat.
|
The title of the Job
of the Day is present at the top of the entry but is
not underlined, handwriting is acceptable.
|
There is no title or
date to signify the beginning of the journal entry,
handwriting is poor or illegible.
|
____
|
Mathematical Process
|
-little written -confusing
or inaccurate information presented
|
-little development
-process not clearly presented with little mathematical
support
|
-fairly well developed
-process clearly presented with mathematical support
|
- well developed -process
clearly presented with detailed mathematical support
|
____
|
Mathematical Details
|
-mathematical details
and diagrams not given or are incorrect -lacks logical
sequence of steps
|
-vague mathematical
details and diagrams given,do not help explain the topic
-few of the steps are logically equenced
|
-clear and logical
mathematical details and diagrams that adequately explain
the topic -most steps are logically sequenced
|
-precise and insightful
mathematical details and diagrams that thoroughly explain
the topic -all steps are logically sequenced
|
____
|
Mathematical Terminology
|
- no mathematical terminology
used
|
- some mathematical
terminology used, may be incorrect
|
-adequate mathematical
terminology used
|
-insightful and effective
mathematical teminology used
|
____
|
Connections to Math
Knowledge
|
-no attempt to connect
reasoning to mathematical knowledge
|
-did not correctly
connect reasoning to mathematical knowledge
|
-appropriately connects
reasoning to mathematical knowledge (definitions, laws,
properties)
|
-effectively and specifically
connects reasoning to mathematical knowledge (definitions,
laws, properties)
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|